Lawmakers move to disclose personal finances, but some fear ‘watered down’ disclosure on the horizon – Jahanagahi
Personal Finance

Lawmakers move to disclose personal finances, but some fear ‘watered down’ disclosure on the horizon

LANSING (WXYZ) — In a surprise move Tuesday, lawmakers in both the House and Senate approved a ballot initiative that could bring Michigan in line with 48 other states in requiring some form of financial disclosure among elected leaders.

The resolution, overwhelmingly approved in both chambers, would require the Governor, Lieutenant Governor, Secretary of State, Attorney General and members of the House and Senate to regularly disclose their personal finances to help identify any conflicts of

RELATED: State secrets: Michigan lawmakers keep personal finances hidden

“We’ve seen ethical breaches time and time again where legislators have introduced bills that deal specifically with their personal industry or business,” said Senator Jeremy Moss (D-Southfield), “or they don’t recuse themselves on votes that could personally enrich their family.”

Moss has long pushed to make the legislature more transparent, advocating to extend the Freedom of Information Act to elected leaders as well as pushing for stronger ethics rules.

“If you don’t know anything about someone’s finances, when they introduce a piece of legislation, you have no idea if they’re going to be financially benefiting from it,” said Simon D. Schuster, Executive Director of the Michigan Campaign Finance Network.

Tied to term limits

The ballot initiative will go to voters this November and, if approved, would also change how long state senators and representatives can serve in Lansing, reducing the total number of years from 14 to 12.

But it would allow members to spend more time in either chamber. Right now, lawmakers can serve up to six years in the House or eight in the Senate. This proposal would increase that number to 12.

As 7 Action News first reported more than a year ago, lawmakers in Michigan and Idaho are the only ones in the country allowed to keep voters in the dark about how they make their money.

Critics say not requiring disclosure makes it harder to know if lawmakers have investments in businesses they may also regulate or own stocks in a company for which they could be asked to approve tax breaks.

‘A watered-down version’

While Tuesday’s vote marks the most progress to date to introduce financial disclosure to Lansing, there are already signs that some are looking to limit how much they’ll have to share.

The original proposal called for lawmakers to file the same detailed disclosure as members of Congress. But that was taken out and, instead, Michigan lawmakers will craft their own rules.

That means, for example, that travel paid for by dark money groups—like trips that former House Speaker Lee Chatfield reportedly enjoyed for years in Lansing—could still remain secret.

“I don’t think anyone could argue that this is not a watered-down version of what was initially proposed,” Schuster said.

Still, lawmakers like Senator Moss are optimistic. After years of ranking as the least transparent state in the country, he says there’s nowhere to go but up.

“I have served too many years with too many lawmakers who have had too many ethical breaches,” he said. “And so we have to learn from those gaps in the law.”

Contact 7 Investigator Ross Jones at [email protected] or at (248) 827-9466.


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *